On 18 March 2016 at 17:29, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 18 March 2016 at 17:09, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> And we have a lot of small fixes whcih. >>> >>> Why wouldn't a cleanup wait until post freeze? If they've been a mess >>> for this long why possibly impact in a freeze, especially on a Friday >>> night when people aren't around to test? Oh, and there's no details. >>> >> >> You are correct. >> >> 1) The change is to allow for hosts to be blocked via the ansible >> playbook using a jinja template versus adding a version per system. >> 2) The change was tested and deployed on download servers to try and >> get our rsync usable from some bad hosts. >> 3) Kevin asked me to put the change into all the templates before I forgot. >> 4) The change only comes into place if you have a variable defined >> which is only in 1 playbook. > > So the above sounds reasonable but there was no details or patch to > ansible to be able to access impact. My email shows an attachment with the patch included. Did it get stripped somewhere? > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
