On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 18 March 2016 at 17:09, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> And we have a lot of small fixes whcih. >> >> Why wouldn't a cleanup wait until post freeze? If they've been a mess >> for this long why possibly impact in a freeze, especially on a Friday >> night when people aren't around to test? Oh, and there's no details. >> > > You are correct. > > 1) The change is to allow for hosts to be blocked via the ansible > playbook using a jinja template versus adding a version per system. > 2) The change was tested and deployed on download servers to try and > get our rsync usable from some bad hosts. > 3) Kevin asked me to put the change into all the templates before I forgot. > 4) The change only comes into place if you have a variable defined > which is only in 1 playbook. So the above sounds reasonable but there was no details or patch to ansible to be able to access impact. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
