On Jan 21, 2014 2:42 PM, "Luke Macken" <lmacken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 03:11:17PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > So, what I would like to ask is:
> > * what do you think of the project? Worth pursuing or not?
>
> Love it. Totally worth pursuing :)
>
> > * Where should it live?
>
> I'm all for keeping it distro-agnostic, but having a Powered by OpenShift
> button on there couldn't hurt :P
+11
-AdamM
>
> > * Domain name suggestions? (release-monitoring.org, cnucnu.org, cnucnuweb.org,
> > <insert here you own idea>?)
>
> release-monitoring.org is decent, anything with the name cnucnu in it
> will be confusing, but part of me thinks it should contain the word
> upstream.
>
> Do you envision any sort of API for this? We've wanted to have an 'Upstream
> Summary' section in the fedora-packages app for a while now.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Packager#Package_details_.3E_overview
> So having an API that we could hit to get the SCM type/url and latest version
> would be nice :)
>
> It also feels like cnucnu is the Right Place to house DOAP metadata ;)
>
> luke
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
