Re: Fedocal to prod?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:15:42PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 13:00 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:42:56 +0100
> > Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I am getting some pressure to move fedocal to production (which is
> > > pretty nice).

Good!  :)

> > I think admin.fedoraproject.org/calendar or perhaps
> > apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar would be fine. 
> 
> hm, since it needs login shouldn't it be admin?

I'm not sure what the original reason for the distinction was, but fyi
apps.fedoraproject.org/tagger requires login.

If it's just an aesthetic choice, I prefer the apps.fp.o/calendar one.
Either way, I can add this to the apps.fp.o/ landing page when its
ready.

-Ralph

Attachment: pgpb552PI_q32.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux