Re: Fedocal to prod?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 13:00 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:42:56 +0100
> Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I am getting some pressure to move fedocal to production (which is
> > pretty nice).
> > 
> > So just to be sure the next steps should be:
> > - roll out the 0.1.0 release
> > - package it
> >   - it now has a setup.py so I hope that it'll be pretty simple
> > - request for hosting/hw ?
> > - create the adequate puppet module
> >   - which url? admin.fedoraproject.org/calendar ?
> 
> Sounds reasonable. In addition: 
> 
> - What are the monitoring requirements? 

None specific, the standard package?

> - Should we use caching/proxies for it? 

Caching might be nice, especially for the ical feed if lot of people
subscribe to it/them.

> - If it gets a lot of load, can we add more instances and load balance
>   them?

Toshio said that should work for flask. I did not perform any tests
though.

> - Whats the db requirement?

Postgres is fine.

> > Do I miss anything?
> 
> I think admin.fedoraproject.org/calendar or perhaps
> apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar would be fine. 

hm, since it needs login shouldn't it be admin?

> > Also, what's the traditional time-line to move from stg to prod?
> 
> Mostly stg is so we can get puppet sorted out and find any issues with
> proxying and caching and such. It can sometimes be pretty short if
> there's no particular issues found. 

Cool! :)


Thanks for the feedback,

Pierre
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux