On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:13:28 -0600 Clint Savage <herlo1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: ...snip... > > Is there any ongoing maint we need to do with sticky-notes? > > Probably any php security issues should be watched. We do use a mysql > database for this application, so probably good to keep that backed up > from time to time. The only other maintenance is updates to > sticky-notes. I suspect we'll probably want to purge the pastes at > some point in time, so there might be a need for a cron job to do such > a thing. ok. I would expect it to grow pretty slowly. Text should compress pretty well in the db I would hope. > We should probably investigate and document the best configs for the > Project Honey Pot configuration. I also understand that Fedora Project > will need an account at http://www.projecthoneypot.org/httpbl_api.php > to use the honey pot. I'm a bit leary of using a external service like this. Perhaps we could wait and see if we need to use it, or if the other spam controls are sufficent? > I'm a big fan of https://paste.fedoraproject.org but > http://fedoraproject.org/paste is fine as well. Does this service keep any cookies or require any fas login? I would guess not... > What value would this gain us? I suppose if a ton of people were > visiting a specific paste right after it was posted, we could see a > performance benefit. yeah. if 50 people hit the same paste it would be cached at the proxies. > I took a look last night at fpaste and was able to hack it to work > with the development version of sticky-notes. From what I can tell the > old fpaste.org did things differently in terms of return details and > such. I'm planning on submitting the patches upstream today. ok. > The fpaste client is written to work specifically with fpaste.org and > not much else. This is not necessarily a bad thing. I just don't know > if it would be better to just create fedpaste and have it provide > fpaste or something like that going forward. I think I want to ask the > maintainer of fpaste how they would like to proceed and see where we > go from there. ok. Sounds good. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
