On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:42:27 -0600 Clint Savage <herlo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For those of you who may be interested, we're finally moving forward > to update the fedora pastebin server. We're planning the new pastebin > to represent fpaste.org and be an instance of sticky-notes > (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/sticky-notes). > Athmane already has a puppet configuration and this is noted in the > ticket below. A few questions: Is there any ongoing maint we need to do with sticky-notes? Do we need to populate a badwords blacklist ? Are there any SOP's that need written? I know it has an admin interface, we should note what that might be useful for and how to access it for admins. It would be good to describe how to remove a paste that had copyrighted stuff or something. No google+ share link? :) What final url do we want to use? https://apps.fedoraproject.org/sticky-notes/ https://fedoraproject.org/sticky-notes/ https://sticky-notes.fedoraproject.org/ https://apps.fedoraproject.org/paste/ https://fedoraproject.org/paste/ https://paste.fedoraproject.org/ https://something else? Do we want to cache pastes with varnish? Or not bother? > We will also be needing to work with the maintainer of fpaste to > update the configuration there and should have that part done soon as > well. I think this would be good to have in place... just for now an option or a config file that points it to the staging instance. Once we go live we can push out a updated fpaste again that changes the default. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
