Mike McGrath wrote: > I was under the impression that gitweb-caching was a massive step away > from gitweb proper. Can anyone correct me on that? It is, but John H. sent a patch series to the git list to try and get his code into git proper, which would be the best of both worlds. It's still being discussed, so if infra wants to use a gitweb-caching package in the interim that seems reasonable. I'm not so sure it's worth getting such a package into Fedora, as we'll push a git with a caching gitweb fairly quickly once it's included upstream. To me, the effort is best spent getting it accepted upstream rather than creating a forked package that will (hopefully) be made irrelevant fairly soon. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ever notice that even the busiest people are never too busy to tell you just how busy they are?
Attachment:
pgpWMUPDpGJlS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
