Re: Goals for F13?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Todd Zullinger wrote:

> Mike McGrath wrote:
> > I was under the impression that gitweb-caching was a massive step away
> > from gitweb proper.  Can anyone correct me on that?
>
> It is, but John H. sent a patch series to the git list to try and get
> his code into git proper, which would be the best of both worlds.
> It's still being discussed, so if infra wants to use a gitweb-caching
> package in the interim that seems reasonable.
>
> I'm not so sure it's worth getting such a package into Fedora, as
> we'll push a git with a caching gitweb fairly quickly once it's
> included upstream.  To me, the effort is best spent getting it
> accepted upstream rather than creating a forked package that will
> (hopefully) be made irrelevant fairly soon.
>

I agree, I was under the impression that upstream wasn't interested in the
new patches.  Probably because I wasn't paying attention and assumed it :)

	-Mike

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux