On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Jon Stanley wrote: > > I think that gitweb-caching will help a lot here, I just need to > > ping warthog9 and get him sponsored, packages built and in > > epel-testing. > > That and continuing to get the caching stuff pushed upstream would be > good. The discussion I've seen on the git list is generally positive, > they just want to ensure that it's done in a clean way that doesn't > negatively impact those who use gitweb without caching. That way we'd > be able to use the stock gitweb packages and not have to maintain > another package. :) > I was under the impression that gitweb-caching was a massive step away from gitweb proper. Can anyone correct me on that? -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
