On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:40:40PM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:09:27PM +0800, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 04/29/2009 08:20 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:17:55AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > >>> Maybe the cleanest solution is to count downloaded bytes and divide by > > >>> image size. That way you properly count ranged downloads. > > >> Command suggestions are very welcome. I really don't have time to > > >> delve into this incredibly deeply at the moment. > > > > > > Could you post a small fragment of the raw logs? But it seems like all > > > we see are the primary redirects, possibly w/o noting ranges in the > > > logs. E.g. for better statistics the logs would need to capture the > > > ranges from the head as well. > > > > > > > I think that information is not available, because no one (almost) > > downloads directly from the Fedora servers, only from the mirrors. > > Therefore, the real data, like range requests, etc., would only be on > > the mirror servers themselves, and not on the primary ones. > > Isn't a range request sent in the header of the HTTP request which > would hit the Fedora servers before being redirected? Can someone on the Infrastructure guru team help me pull some relevant lines from the logs, expurgating the IP address and any other identifying information so we're not running afoul of any privacy concerns? -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
