On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:40:40PM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:09:27PM +0800, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > On 04/29/2009 08:20 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:17:55AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > >>> Maybe the cleanest solution is to count downloaded bytes and divide by > > > >>> image size. That way you properly count ranged downloads. > > > >> Command suggestions are very welcome. I really don't have time to > > > >> delve into this incredibly deeply at the moment. > > > > > > > > Could you post a small fragment of the raw logs? But it seems like all > > > > we see are the primary redirects, possibly w/o noting ranges in the > > > > logs. E.g. for better statistics the logs would need to capture the > > > > ranges from the head as well. > > > > > > > > > > I think that information is not available, because no one (almost) > > > downloads directly from the Fedora servers, only from the mirrors. > > > Therefore, the real data, like range requests, etc., would only be on > > > the mirror servers themselves, and not on the primary ones. > > > > Isn't a range request sent in the header of the HTTP request which > > would hit the Fedora servers before being redirected? > > Can someone on the Infrastructure guru team help me pull some relevant > lines from the logs, expurgating the IP address and any other > identifying information so we're not running afoul of any privacy > concerns? > 255.255.255.255 - - [22/Mar/2009:23:59:44 +0000] "GET /pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Live/i686/F10-i686-Live.iso HTTP/1.1" 302 -"http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora"; "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)" Bam! -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
