-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/30/2009 02:40 AM, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:09:27PM +0800, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote: >> On 04/29/2009 08:20 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:17:55AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: >>>>> Maybe the cleanest solution is to count downloaded bytes and divide by >>>>> image size. That way you properly count ranged downloads. >>>> Command suggestions are very welcome. I really don't have time to >>>> delve into this incredibly deeply at the moment. >>> Could you post a small fragment of the raw logs? But it seems like all >>> we see are the primary redirects, possibly w/o noting ranges in the >>> logs. E.g. for better statistics the logs would need to capture the >>> ranges from the head as well. >>> >> I think that information is not available, because no one (almost) >> downloads directly from the Fedora servers, only from the mirrors. >> Therefore, the real data, like range requests, etc., would only be on >> the mirror servers themselves, and not on the primary ones. > > Isn't a range request sent in the header of the HTTP request which > would hit the Fedora servers before being redirected? Not if the range request was after being redirected. I think, in the same download, the redirect is only processed once, even if it is a temporary one. Therefore, unless the first request was a partial content one, then the connection has already been redirected to the mirror server, and thus the main Fedora server will not see it. I'd draw a diagram, but I'm terrible at doing so. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkn43cAACgkQaVgOCFr0s2I/sgCeKLAd+qxiOpr08HwSqYAIKxp/ uA0AnR6FIoh4Ov4Ggqt1OJ3uOBzBSxHQ =kgXY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
