On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:27:36PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Hello, > > This question is asked in the context of > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pertusus/Draft_keeping_infra_open_for_EOL > which has not already been approved by FESCO, so this could have no > follow-up, though I think that this issue is also relevant for EPEL. > > Till raised an interesting issue associated with adding more releases in > bodhi: each release takes some place in the left menu. Another could > still be right, but I think that 4 or more will certainly be > problematic. Has this issue already been considered? What is the plan > for EPEL when it switches to using bodhi? In addition to being there > there will be in the end 3 to 5 EPEL versions in parallel so this is > certainly an issue that will arise. > > Any comment, idea? The next major bodhi release will allow single updates to span across various releases. I also would like to add a differentiation between 'Products' (Fedora/EPEL). With this new model, we could easily come up with a nice sidebar view that can encompass everything. > If it ends up that for the proposal (or for EPEL) another bodhi server > has to be set up, can you tell if it is easy rather easy to set up and > administer or rather hard? It's extremely easy to setup, and not very difficult to maintain, but I'm not sure I see any value in setting up a separate instance for EPEL. luke _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
