Re: Public demo of amber and eventual production instance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT)
> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> >
> > > On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > > > Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or
> > > > something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow
> > > > to help if needed.
> > > If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at
> > > admin.fedoraproject.org so that it can share cookies with our other
> > > applications.
> > >
> >
> > it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why.  I'm
> > fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff.  But if this is
> > an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite
> > right.
>
> Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app.  As you said, it's targeted
> at end users.
>

Does it have an authed interface for admins or does it pull everything
from our repos and such?

	-Mike

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux