On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT) > Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote: > > > > > On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote: > > > > Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or > > > > something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow > > > > to help if needed. > > > If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at > > > admin.fedoraproject.org so that it can share cookies with our other > > > applications. > > > > > > > it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. I'm > > fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff. But if this is > > an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite > > right. > > Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app. As you said, it's targeted > at end users. > Does it have an authed interface for admins or does it pull everything from our repos and such? -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
