Re: Public demo of amber and eventual production instance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> 
> > On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > > Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or
> > > something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow
> > > to help if needed.
> > If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at
> > admin.fedoraproject.org so that it can share cookies with our other
> > applications.
> >
> 
> it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why.  I'm
> fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff.  But if this is
> an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite
> right.

Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app.  As you said, it's targeted
at end users.

-RN

-- 
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.

"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux