On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote: > > > On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote: > > > Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or > > > something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow > > > to help if needed. > > If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at > > admin.fedoraproject.org so that it can share cookies with our other > > applications. > > > > it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. I'm > fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff. But if this is > an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite > right. Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app. As you said, it's targeted at end users. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
