On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:49:47 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT) > > Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote: > > > > > > > On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote: > > > > > Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or > > > > > something like that, hopefully I'll be back later > > > > > today/tomorrow to help if needed. > > > > If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at > > > > admin.fedoraproject.org so that it can share cookies with our > > > > other applications. > > > > > > > > > > it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. > > > I'm fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff. But if > > > this is an application that end users will be using that doesn't > > > seem quite right. > > > > Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app. As you said, it's > > targeted at end users. > > > > Does it have an authed interface for admins or does it pull everything > from our repos and such? It auth against FAS. First, anyone with a FAS account can log in, and post comments and whatnot. Second, if the user happens to own a package that provides a given application, she can edit the app's description, and do things like delete comments and screenshots. Third, if a user is a member of the 'amber_admins' group, he can do the above for all apps, and a few other things. Does that answer your question? -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
