On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:35:25PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 10:33 -0400, Jeffrey Tadlock wrote: > > > > My suggestion would be (if current resources allow for it - people and > > hardware) that we start with hosting Fedora specific videos. Use this > > as a pilot program. It is easier to justify as the content is > > directly related to Fedora and acts as a natural filter for requests. > > We can use this hosting experiment as a way to better "guesstimate" > > what would need to be in place (disk space wise, etc) before offering > > space for other conference videos. Once we have a better idea of > > space, bandwidth, etc. we can determine how to scale or if we should > > scale to the larger offering. +1. This seems entirely reasonable, and in keeping with what we've done in the past. Torrent-only, as Jesse noted, is sufficient for this purpose at this time. > Fair, but maybe expanded a bit? If a Fedora Ambassador went to an event > and in the name of Fedora gave at least one (captured) talk, all > captured talks of said event would be acceptable to host on Fedora > infrastructure, should the resources of the day handle it, for a set > time. This isn't bad, but until we have a space estimate of available space (remembering we're about to load F9 there too) I wouldn't want to commit those resources to non-Fedora-specific content yet. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
