On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 10:33 -0400, Jeffrey Tadlock wrote: > > My suggestion would be (if current resources allow for it - people and > hardware) that we start with hosting Fedora specific videos. Use this > as a pilot program. It is easier to justify as the content is > directly related to Fedora and acts as a natural filter for requests. > We can use this hosting experiment as a way to better "guesstimate" > what would need to be in place (disk space wise, etc) before offering > space for other conference videos. Once we have a better idea of > space, bandwidth, etc. we can determine how to scale or if we should > scale to the larger offering. Fair, but maybe expanded a bit? If a Fedora Ambassador went to an event and in the name of Fedora gave at least one (captured) talk, all captured talks of said event would be acceptable to host on Fedora infrastructure, should the resources of the day handle it, for a set time. > -- Jesse Keating RHCE (jkeating.livejournal.com) Fedora Project (fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
