seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 17:25 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> At 5GB+, (4.5GB for a copy of the cvs repo + 700MB for git) that's too >> heavy for me. And besides, it'd really be better under the Fedora >> umbrella. Seeing as how much more efficient the git protocol is, >> if a few people switch to it from cvs, it'd actually decrease network >> bandwidth requirements. > > The problem is we're not running out of network bandwidth most of the > time. We're running out of disk space. Pretty badly, too. One big advantage to switching from CVS to git is the savings in disk space. With the example above it's pretty obvious: you can save exactly the same information using git in 1/6 to 1/4th the space. _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
