On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 01:06:06AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 12:49:31AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > Option 3: Roll our own TurboGears wiki > > > > Advantages: > > - We're in control (workflow, features, upstream, etc.) > > - Integration with FAS is trivial > > > > Disadvantages: > > - Almost no current specifications > > - Minimal existing code (based on requirements) > > - Smaller developer base > > - Content many need to be transcribed (based on requirements) > > - GSoC work may need retooling (based on requirements) > > Won't there be performance problems with a TurboGears-based wiki? I > thought MirrorManager was having issues with TG performance and had to > enable form-data caching to get acceptable performance at the cost of > possibly stale data. I don't know the details behind it, but that was > the reason I was given for why when you edit forms in MM it sometimes > returns old pre-edit field values. correct. Now, my TG-foo may not strong enough to overcome this, but perhaps it's easier for others? I'm still not convinced to throw the baby out with the bathwater. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
