On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 18:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 14:12 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Mike McGrath wrote: > >>> I've created a start asterisk page on the wiki. Please take a look / > >>> change it so it makes sense. Also anything to add to the > >>> troubleshooting section will be much appreciated. Just think about any > >>> issues that came up when you were connecting. > >>> > >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Asterisk > >> Shouldn't the package review completed and the package be in the > >> repository before being used in infrastructure? > > > > No. The package review really only has to be started and in progress. We > > don't want to hold up infrastructure deployments forever. > > I kind of get different answers each time on this. One of the reasons > why it is useful to document policies like I said sometime back on the > same topic is to have common understanding and expectations. > The policy is pretty simple and unwritten on purpose- we try to make sure we have a package in fedora/epel for anything we use in infrastructure. For testing environments like publictest we don't require it but we do try to make sure the process is in motion. The reason the policy is unwritten is so our hands aren't tied waiting for a review or a package push to happen. -sv
