Re: Infrastructure SCM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:19:43AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday 02 July 2007 9:13:10 am Mike McGrath wrote:
> > starting this up again.  Since we want it to be distributed we're left
> > with either git or mercurial.  Can I take a non-binding vote from the
> > people on this list as to a preference on each?  Remember, our needs in
> > Infrastructure are really pretty simple, so at a glance.  What do you
> > guys think?
> >
> >
> > git:
> >
> > mercurial:
> +1 i find it a little easier  though its really a coin toss

+1. There's also better intergration with other tools like trac, and
it's written in Fedora's favourite script language, so when something
comes up we'd be able to attack it instead of submitting feature
requests.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpk3e81RKrv8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux