On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 09:19 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Monday 02 July 2007 9:13:10 am Mike McGrath wrote: > > starting this up again. Since we want it to be distributed we're left > > with either git or mercurial. Can I take a non-binding vote from the > > people on this list as to a preference on each? Remember, our needs in > > Infrastructure are really pretty simple, so at a glance. What do you > > guys think? > > > > > > git: > > > > mercurial: > +1 i find it a little easier though its really a coin toss bzr: +1 :-) Easier than git or mercurial from a former svn user's perspective. With either git or mercurial, I'll spend some time learning it and then just use whichever is implemented. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
