On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 15:19 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 18 June 2007 15:09:29 Jeremy Katz wrote: > > There are other things where we've set up repos (generally under the > > hosted space but not always) that also don't need the full "hosted" > > treatment. And being able to continue doing so is very valuable. > > > > And it will become even more needed as we get things moved from elvis -> > > fp.org. Having a "hosted" project is overkill for a lot of the things > > there, but they definitely need some SCM bits. > > Perhaps it's worth pointing out that we can do "hosting" without a Trac space. > The Hosting right now is really 2 part. SCM space and a group in FAS to > manage write access to it, and a Trac instance. In the future there may be > other parts like raw webspace to host http or file content (such as release > tarballs...), shell accounts to manage said files, etc... We can host > projects that use some or all of these services. By no means should each and > every project have to make use of or even have each and every service. Yeah, that's a much better way to say what I was trying to get at :-) Jeremy
