On Thursday 07 June 2007 11:49:57 Mike McGrath wrote: > I agree, I had no plans on upgrading any of our RHEL boxes (except for > cvs and db1 but will stay in the RHEL upgrade path). For those of you > that are new on the list we've had a lot of discussions about this in > the past. Our team, for the most part, agrees that its about picking > the right tool for the job. For boxes that don't need brand new > technologies (like cvs) its nice to be able to set them up and forget > about them. But for some boxes that do need the latest and greatest > (like our builders) we've always had and kept them on Fedora. With RHEL5 out, I question the need for Fedora on the builders. In fact, before the merge, all the internal Core builders were running RHEL4. Can we not use RHEL5 on the builders now? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgp7MU7YgYTkg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
