it is a "nice to have" ... not a "must" to have a firstname.lastname@xxxx ... Why everybody want to discuss decissions? Sometimes, I thought I better took the red pill ... Regards GeroldKa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Am Montag, den 30.04.2007, 15:29 -0200 schrieb Itamar Reis Peixoto: > I don't like this. > > I don't like to work for a company who give the name of my email address, > who choice the style of my hair, the style of my shirt's. > > > -------------------- > > Itamar Reis Peixoto > > e-mail: itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > msn: itamarjp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > skype: itamarjp > icq: 81053601 > +55 34 3238 3845 > +55 11 4063 5033 > > > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Mike McGrath wrote: > >>> > >>> * All alises for the ambassadors must be firstname.lastname@xxxx > >> > >> As in they should not be using their account names as aliases? I would > >> prefer to continue using what I use currently. > > > > the username@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx will continue but an extra alias can be > > created for them by request of firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It > > was available to them up until just last week. > > > > -Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list > Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
