Re: Ambassador Aliases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



it is a "nice to have" ...
not a "must" to have a firstname.lastname@xxxx ...

Why everybody want to discuss decissions? 

Sometimes, I thought I better took the red pill ...

Regards

GeroldKa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Am Montag, den 30.04.2007, 15:29 -0200 schrieb Itamar Reis Peixoto:
> I don't like this.
> 
> I don't like to work for a company who give the name of my email address, 
> who choice the style of my hair, the style of my shirt's.
> 
> 
> --------------------
> 
> Itamar Reis Peixoto
> 
> e-mail: itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> msn: itamarjp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> skype: itamarjp
> icq: 81053601
> +55 34 3238 3845
> +55 11 4063 5033
> 
> > Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> Mike McGrath wrote:
> >>>
> >>> * All alises for the ambassadors must be firstname.lastname@xxxx
> >>
> >> As in they should not be using their account names as aliases? I would 
> >> prefer to continue using what I use currently.
> >
> > the username@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx will continue but an extra alias can be 
> > created for them by request of firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  It 
> > was available to them up until just last week.
> >
> >    -Mike
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux