Am 2007-03-12 18:53, Thorsten Leemhuis schrieb:
Oliver Falk schrieb:
Am 2007-03-11 12:21, Thorsten Leemhuis schrieb:
I think this is something that should be discussed on the next board
meeting; Shouldn't it? Someone from board on this list?
I think working out details like this is more for FESCo (the whole
secondary arch stuff is IMHO something more for FESCo these days and not
for the board, which handles it currently afaics and should only drive
the idea, not the details imho).
ack.
Anyway, I think it's enough to keep in mind for now and bring it up when
the details of the secondary arch stuff is worked out (or is somebody
working on that already?).
First of all it must be clear if there's (or will be) enough space
(storage) available. Technically I don't see any problem to implement
secondary archs. Any other mind?
However, I'm not in the infrastructure group, nor in FESCo. It's up to
you (FI/FESCo) now to bring up the ideas and solutions at the right
point. :-) Of course, I'm willing to help out wherever I can...
Best,
Oliver
