Hi Luya,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 1:36 PM <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2021-10-24 10:18 p.m., Parag Nemade <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Luya,
>
> As noticed, two subpackaged webfonts are listed because they are
> required from the landing page for Fedora Apache. The challenge is to
> keep these lines with the new spec version. Pointers welcome.
>
>
>
> I will suggest you report a re-review of this package and we can discuss
> packaging in that review bug. Also AFAIK woff font files are not
> permitted to be packaged. See
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/FontsPolicy/#_font_file_formats
> <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/FontsPolicy/#_font_file_formats>
Those are subpackages from julietaula-montserrat-fonts needed by fedora-logos-httpd for their landing page. What will be a better alternative to prevent
breaking? Maybe apply the changes for Rawhide?
Note that some packages fonts provides woff which predated the new policy such as:
- comic-neue-web-fonts.noarch
- kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts.noarch
- mathjax-stixweb-fonts.noarch
Those packages which are not yet migrated to follow new fonts packaging guidelines are still providing woff files. I think you really don't need woff files for fedora-logos-httpd package. You just need below change in fedora-logos.spec file
Recommends: julietaula-montserrat-base-web-fonts
to
Recommends: julietaula-montserrat-fonts
That should work fine. Firefox will render using Montserrat font only but will use otf files.
Regards,
Parag
_______________________________________________ fonts mailing list -- fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
