On 2021-10-24 10:18 p.m., Parag Nemade <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Luya,
As noticed, two subpackaged webfonts are listed because they are
required from the landing page for Fedora Apache. The challenge is to
keep these lines with the new spec version. Pointers welcome.
I will suggest you report a re-review of this package and we can discuss
packaging in that review bug. Also AFAIK woff font files are not
permitted to be packaged. See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/FontsPolicy/#_font_file_formats
<https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/FontsPolicy/#_font_file_formats>�
Those are subpackages from julietaula-montserrat-fonts needed by fedora-logos-httpd for their landing page. What will be a better alternative to prevent
breaking? Maybe apply the changes for Rawhide?
Note that some packages fonts provides woff which predated the new policy such as:
- comic-neue-web-fonts.noarch
- kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts.noarch
- mathjax-stixweb-fonts.noarch
Luya
_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list -- fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
