Re: Intent to relicense fontpackages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Le mardi 30 octobre 2018 à 11:47 +0530, Parag Nemade a écrit :
> Hi,
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 9:14 PM Nicolas Mailhot <
> nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Just FYI, I intend to relicense fontpackages from LGPL3+ to GPL3+,
> > to
> > make sharing parts with go-macros easier.
> Can it be possible for you to explain this further? I want to
> understand how license change can help here.

I just have two macro sets under different licenses to maintain, with
pretty much the same functions and layout, and I'd like to copy good
ideas from one to the other without needing to worry about licensing.
The easiest one to relicense is fontpackages as the Go macro project
contains big amounts of code to workaround the lack of standard native
packaging tech Go-side.

As I wrote in my message, it does not change anything effectively for
fontpackages. The differences between GPL and LGPL trigger on linking,
and fontpackages does not include any lib linked elsewhere.


Nicolas Mailhot
fonts mailing list -- fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines:
List Archives:

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Font Configuration]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux