On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Nicolas Spalinger <nicolas_spalinger@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/16/2014 05:22 PM, Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to maintain/co-maintain PT Serif[1] and PT Mono[2] fonts by >> paratype. Would it be better to include them in the existing PT >> Sans[3] fonts package - incorporate in the same spec as multiple >> packages, or as individual specs? >> >> Here's the altered spec file[4] and srpm[5] combining all 3 paratype >> fonts. (Note the hack in %prep phase due to source packages containing >> same file names). What do you think? >> >> [1] http://www.paratype.com/uni/public/PTSerif.zip >> [2] http://www.paratype.com/uni/public/PTMono.zip > > > Thanks for taking care of packaging these fonts! > > BTW, I suspect you want > http://www.fontstock.com/public/PTSerifOFL.zip > http://www.fontstock.com/public/PTMonoOFL.zip > instead of the ones with Paratype's very own incompatible foundry-specific license. > > The links are not prominently displayed but the .zip files are still there. Thank you all for the inputs, greatly helpful. As Nicolas Mahilot also suggested, I will open separate review requests for PT Serif and PT Mono fonts and use the OFL source. nim, how did you check for Unicode codepoint correctness in the fonts? > > -- Rajeesh _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
