On 11/16/2014 05:22 PM, Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to maintain/co-maintain PT Serif[1] and PT Mono[2] fonts by > paratype. Would it be better to include them in the existing PT > Sans[3] fonts package - incorporate in the same spec as multiple > packages, or as individual specs? > > Here's the altered spec file[4] and srpm[5] combining all 3 paratype > fonts. (Note the hack in %prep phase due to source packages containing > same file names). What do you think? > > [1] http://www.paratype.com/uni/public/PTSerif.zip > [2] http://www.paratype.com/uni/public/PTMono.zip Thanks for taking care of packaging these fonts! BTW, I suspect you want http://www.fontstock.com/public/PTSerifOFL.zip http://www.fontstock.com/public/PTMonoOFL.zip instead of the ones with Paratype's very own incompatible foundry-specific license. The links are not prominently displayed but the .zip files are still there. -- Nicolas _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
