Hi again, On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Parag N(पराग़) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 15 October 2014 21:08, Paul Flo Williams <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I am curious about the metadata files you're adding to font packages: they >>> all claim to be copyrighted by you, but without any licensing information. >> >> The licensing of the files is CC0 -- it's specified in the metadata >> file itself. I'm happy relicencing this to any acceptable content >> licence in any of the package if this is required. >> >>> I presume the licence of the font package itself isn't affected? >> >> I suppose really the licence field should include "CC0" -- but it >> might be simpler just to change the metadata licence to be CC-BY (or >> whatever the font already is) just for simplicity. >> >> Note: I'm only going to add metadata to ten packages as a test for >> tomorrows metadata build. > > I just read the blog post and will add appdata files to all fonts > packages I own by this weekend in F21 and F22. > I will keep license for appdata files as CC-BY but then I think > license tag should also include "CC-BY". Looks like we better should seek FPC advice on changing all such font package license tags. I have just built typemade-josefinsansstd-light-fonts in rawhide. I have filed a FPC ticket https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/462 and going to ask the same on FPC list. Regards, Parag _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
