On 10 March 2014 13:50, Paul Flo Williams <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think the Latin-centric view is that any standard English pangram is > reasonable, so they don't supply it. Yes, that's fair enough. > Non-Latin scripts would really benefit from some good sample text. Is there any precedent here? Like a Punjabi version of "How quickly daft jumping zebras vex" that shows off the majority of the glyphs? > As the font packaging guidelines now require us to make font metadata > corrections for licence-related strings, meaning you'll see more font > packages using tools like ttname, it isn't a big leap to suggest that we > also supply readsonable sample text, and suggest that upstream include it. That would be awesome. More fonts also using TT_NAME_ID_PREFERRED_FAMILY correctly would be great for my uses too. Richard. _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
