Re: Muli fonts packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 09:03:32PM +0100, bebo_sudo wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm going to package the "muli" fonts
> (http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/muli) by Vernon Adams.
> 
> What I'd ask is: Is it correct to name the package
>     vernon-adams-muli-fonts
Looks OK, if Vernon Adams has also made, will make, or at least
is expected to make other fonts available that might be packaged
for Fedora.

> And another question: the designer, Vernon Adams, hosts the source
> file on fontsquirrel, as you can see from the above link, but he
> didn't set a version number. Should I set it to 1.0 or what else?
It's probably better to use the date (20131226 or something) as the
version.

I'm not an expert, so if somebody gives conflicting advice, they
are probably right.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list
fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Font Configuration]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux