On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 22:22 +0100, Dave Crossland wrote: > 2008/7/30 Vasile Gaburici <vgaburici@xxxxxxxxx>: > > My lack of legal brain is confused on this. If URW doesn't change the > > license and it remains purely GPL, but the other contributors agree to > > re-license their parts as GLP+FontException, then what is there to be > > gained by this? Isn't the user bound by most restrictive license in > > the package, that is pure GPL? > > That is my understanding, and my point :-) Yes, that is true, but: A) The package is then distributable B) The only remaining issue is to sell URW on the font exception, which can be done at any time. ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
