2008/7/30 Vasile Gaburici <vgaburici@xxxxxxxxx>: > My lack of legal brain is confused on this. If URW doesn't change the > license and it remains purely GPL, but the other contributors agree to > re-license their parts as GLP+FontException, then what is there to be > gained by this? Isn't the user bound by most restrictive license in > the package, that is pure GPL? That is my understanding, and my point :-) _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
