On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:12:13PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 06/28/2011 12:57 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:58:58AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:28:58PM -0400, Marcela Maslanova wrote: > >> > >>> If you like imagine how bad it is, see: > >>> http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl_rebuild/5.14/notbuilt.svg ;-) It > >>> doesn't contain current data, but it shows the most problematic places. > >>> > >> > >> The picture is horrible as it constructs package names from Perl module > >> names. I will provide better one soon. > >> > > I've uploaded new picture where destinations are real source package base > > names. > > > > Graph explanation: This picture represents relation `a source package > > BuildRequires another source package'. It considers direct build-time > > dependencies only and it cuts degenerated leaf substrees (i.e. recursively > > removed packages that do buildrequire nothing). Input is set of not yet > > rebuilt packages. So the picture is not perfect, it's just a raw > > depiction. > > Do you have the data behind this graph somewhere? I'm trying to figure out > where the circular build dependency between Test::EOL and > Pod::Coverage::TrustPod is that necessitated turning off > Pod::Coverage::TrustPod as a buildreq for Test::EOL when bootstrapping, and > I can't really see it from the picture. > In the same directory as the SVG file, there is file without extension listing not yet rebuild source package base names. If you are curious for the generator, I can publish it too (but I'm quite ashamed of it). -- Petr
Attachment:
pgptRGJ2aZw1N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
