On 06/28/2011 12:57 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:58:58AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:28:58PM -0400, Marcela Maslanova wrote: >> >>> If you like imagine how bad it is, see: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl_rebuild/5.14/notbuilt.svg ;-) >>> It doesn't contain current data, but it shows the most problematic places. >>> >> >> The picture is horrible as it constructs package names from Perl module names. >> I will provide better one soon. >> > I've uploaded new picture where destinations are real source package base > names. > > Graph explanation: This picture represents relation `a source package > BuildRequires another source package'. It considers direct build-time > dependencies only and it cuts degenerated leaf substrees (i.e. recursively > removed packages that do buildrequire nothing). Input is set of not yet > rebuilt packages. So the picture is not perfect, it's just a raw depiction. Do you have the data behind this graph somewhere? I'm trying to figure out where the circular build dependency between Test::EOL and Pod::Coverage::TrustPod is that necessitated turning off Pod::Coverage::TrustPod as a buildreq for Test::EOL when bootstrapping, and I can't really see it from the picture. Paul. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
