On 12/09/2010 03:01 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:35:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 12/09/2010 02:27 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>> On 12/07/2010 04:57 PM, Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà wrote:
>>
>>>>> If core and vendor are the same as it is in F-14, then it's non-existent
>>>>> module looked up twice in the same path without luck.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, my suggestion is change all modules to install into core directories
>>>>> and leave vendorarch empty for personal RPMs, which also cut down time for
>>>>> looking up
>>>>
>>>> How comes, f14 already did so and f15 has stopped doing so?
>>>>
>>> No, it didn't. See spec files.
>>
>> The facts speak a clear language.
>>
>> All f15-built modules now land in %{_libdir}/perl5/vendor_perl instead
>> of %{_libdir}/perl5 as they did in f14.
>>
> You do not differentiate perl symbolic name and and real path.
No, I always referred to the installation directory and to nothing else.
> Yes, the files
> moved to different directory.
Correct. This is the the regression
> I do not say there is no regression in distribution.
Provided the attitude I experience from certain @RH perl-core
maintainers, it will not be me who will fixes this regression.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
