On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:35:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 02:27 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 12/07/2010 04:57 PM, Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà wrote:
>
> >>> If core and vendor are the same as it is in F-14, then it's non-existent
> >>> module looked up twice in the same path without luck.
> >>>
> >>> So, my suggestion is change all modules to install into core directories
> >>> and leave vendorarch empty for personal RPMs, which also cut down time for
> >>> looking up
> >>
> >> How comes, f14 already did so and f15 has stopped doing so?
> >>
> > No, it didn't. See spec files.
>
> The facts speak a clear language.
>
> All f15-built modules now land in %{_libdir}/perl5/vendor_perl instead
> of %{_libdir}/perl5 as they did in f14.
>
You do not differentiate perl symbolic name and and real path. Yes, the files
moved to different directory. No, the symbolic names in spec did not change.
I just explain your confusion.
I do not say there is no regression in distribution.
-- Petr
Attachment:
pgpQHZsxs2MLY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
