Re: rawhide vendorarch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/09/2010 02:27 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 12/07/2010 04:57 PM, Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà wrote:

>>> If core and vendor are the same as it is in F-14, then it's non-existent
>>> module looked up twice in the same path without luck.
>>>
>>> So, my suggestion is change all modules to install into core directories
>>> and leave vendorarch empty for personal RPMs, which also cut down time for
>>> looking up
>>
>> How comes, f14 already did so and f15 has stopped doing so?
>>
> No, it didn't. See spec files.

The facts speak a clear language.

All f15-built modules now land in  %{_libdir}/perl5/vendor_perl instead 
of %{_libdir}/perl5 as they did in f14.

To me, this is a massive regression - period.

Ralf

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux