On 16/03/10 16:33, Iain Arnell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Marcela Maslanova<mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> ----- "Iain Arnell"<iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I >>> guess perl.spec needs a little more work up front to split as much as >>> possible into separate sub-packages. >> >> Ok, but in this case we need for almost every provides a sub-package. >> Wouldn't be sufficient to check perl.spec and create sub-package after >> the separated module will be needed? > > That would also work, of course. But should be mentioned in the guidelines too. Wouldn't this approach mean that the main perl package needed to be updated whenever a new updated module was needed, which was one of the things this scheme was trying to avoid? Paul. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
