----- "Iain Arnell" <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Marcela Maslanova > <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > I've decided fix my build failure of IO::Compress::* (#555420) > > by updating to the latest version, which passed on my testing F-13. > > Please someone take a look at reviews: #573928, #573929, #573932 > > Not quite the first - #573826 beat you to it (by accident). But it > raises an issue we've overlooked. Not all core modules have their own > sub-packages. Many (like Getopt::Long in this bug) exist only in the > core perl rpm. And with the core/vendor directories merged, a > separate > perl-Getopt-Long rpm will conflict with Getopt::Long from core perl. > I > guess perl.spec needs a little more work up front to split as much as > possible into separate sub-packages. > > -- > Iain. > -- > Fedora Extras Perl SIG > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl > perl-devel mailing list > perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel Ok, but in this case we need for almost every provides a sub-package. Wouldn't be sufficient to check perl.spec and create sub-package after the separated module will be needed? -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
