Re: first reviews for "dual packages"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
> I've decided fix my build failure of IO::Compress::* (#555420)
> by updating to the latest version, which passed on my testing F-13.
> Please someone take a look at reviews: #573928, #573929, #573932

Not quite the first - #573826 beat you to it (by accident). But it
raises an issue we've overlooked. Not all core modules have their own
sub-packages. Many (like Getopt::Long in this bug) exist only in the
core perl rpm. And with the core/vendor directories merged, a separate
perl-Getopt-Long rpm will conflict with Getopt::Long from core perl. I
guess perl.spec needs a little more work up front to split as much as
possible into separate sub-packages.

-- 
Iain.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux