On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's where I was going with this. The packages I listed certainly aren't comprehensive -- and I hope I didn't give that impression -- just meant to be a starting point for discussion. The packages an individual person uses clearly vary, well, by person, but I don't think it's difficult to classify something as a "thing[] that might be interesting to developers".
-ChrisOn Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/10/2009 01:28 AM, Chris Weyl wrote:
>>>
>>> Thoughts?I'm inclined to agree - it would certainly be impossible to decide on
>
> I am not excited about this plan, because I feel there is no "common subset"
> of package which is general enough to be used as "devel group" in comps - I
> feel much of what you say above is based on your personal individual
> demands.
>
> E.g. the list you provide above isn't even close to what I use for
> perl-development. I think these are likely what you use for your individual
> purposes.
a Perl Development group that would be suitable for everyone.
But it would be nice to have a group of things that might be
interesting to developers without being forced to wade through more
than 1200 individual '*perl*' rpms (and still missing eclipse-epic if
you were looking for an IDE).
That's where I was going with this. The packages I listed certainly aren't comprehensive -- and I hope I didn't give that impression -- just meant to be a starting point for discussion. The packages an individual person uses clearly vary, well, by person, but I don't think it's difficult to classify something as a "thing[] that might be interesting to developers".
--
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia
-- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
