On 11 Mar 2008 14:18:07 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> "DC" == Dave Cross <dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > DC> I've always had a sneaking suspicion that what I've got are good > DC> enough for me, but not for Fedora's repositories. > > Well, modern cpanspec generates pretty good specs. Generally what you > need to do is verify the license (which unfortunately seems to be the > most time-consuming bit these days), change the License: tag > appropriately, As Dave mentioned earlier the CPANTS project is trying to measure various "kwalitees" of the modules. Among other things it checks if both the META.yaml and the source code has licenses. I am sure the current way of checking it has some flaws but I am also sure the CPANTS project will reduce your work by eliminating some of the issues you encounter. So if you do find a module with problematic licenses it would be great if you could check if CPANTS http://cpants.perl.org/ has also caught that issue. If yes, you can point that out to the author. If not, please ping Thomas Klausner, the CPANTS developer or one of his helpers e.g. me so we can improve the metric used. Gabor -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
