On 11 Mar 2008 14:18:07 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> "DC" == Dave Cross <dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > DC> I've always had a sneaking suspicion that what I've got are good > DC> enough for me, but not for Fedora's repositories. > > Well, modern cpanspec generates pretty good specs. Generally what you > need to do is verify the license (which unfortunately seems to be the > most time-consuming bit these days), change the License: tag > appropriately, and add build dependencies (BuildRequires:) sufficient > to get the module to build in mock and be able to run as much of its > test suite properly. A quick glance over the Summary: and > %description helps as well. > > If the license is unambiguous, this takes a couple of minutes plus > whatever time it takes mock to run. Submitting the review takes a > couple of minutes more. Generally Perl packages are reviewed quickly > because the reviewer usually just needs to verify that you've done the > stuff in the previous paragraph. The perl guidelines at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Perl often help point out the perl-specific bits, as well. IMHO, of course :) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
