>>>>> "GS" == Gabor Szabo <szabgab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: GS> So if you do find a module with problematic licenses it would be GS> great if you could check if CPANTS http://cpants.perl.org/ has GS> also caught that issue. This is good news; Perl modules have often been a source of licensing trouble due to missing or contradictory licenses. Please also note that in Fedora, "problematic license" applies to the plain Artistic license, so if a package licensed under the original Artistic license (not the clarified or 2.0 versions) and does not also have some other license (such as in the "Same as Perl" "GPL+ or Artistic") then it is unfortunately not acceptable for Fedora. For example, Net-SinFP has 104.17% "Kwalitee" on the CPANTS site but is not acceptable for Fedora because it carries only the Artistic license. - J< -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
